I come to praise design, not to bury it.

Media_httpmediasmashi_eapgt

Title: The Dying Art Of Design
Context: Is technology killing the craft of design or fueling a design renaissance? Depends if you are a shitty designer or not.
Synopsis: Oh technology. Why do you always bear the brunt of designs wrath whenever the topic of “craft”, “ability” or “competence” comes up? Sure you might argue that you actually have democratized design, but is that a good idea to begin with? Should we democratize medicine? Engineering? Is everyone capable of being a designer? Probably not. So what does the ubiquity of design tools being bandied about willy-nilly by anyone with access to a computer mean for the future of design? Well, in my humble opinion, design will be fine. Because even as everyone may fancy themselves a designer regardless of their level of skill or training, good design has higher margins than copy-cat, inelegant, amateur design. Sure the market for this low-brow design will always be there, but let the bottom feeders fight over this increasingly crowded space. Practice your craft as a professional and rest secure in the knowledge of where “real” design is happening.
Best Bit: ???[Designers] consume a lot but bypass a deeper understanding of design. In-depth articles and case studies are the least-read articles. Over 75% of the articles that designers read are either design tutorials or inspirational lists.??? Um, uh oh???

User Experience design: It’s science!

Title: Science for Designers: The Meaning of Complexity
Context: Design is surely an art. But it???s also a science. Did I just blow your mind?
Synopsis: [WARNING: THE LINKED ARTICLE CONTAINS HIGHBROW CRITICAL ARCHITECTURAL PROSE. READ AT YOUR OWN RISK.] Oh I do love architectural criticism. What with its run-on sentences, arcane vocabulary and disjointed academic prose. But the author makes several compelling points regarding the dichotomy of design vis-??-vis it???s relationship to the symbiotic mindscapes of the artistic and the scientific (see, I can speak in jibberish too!) The point being ??? if you dig hard enough to find it ??? is that design has fallen prey to its own artistic conceit in many cases, ignoring its empirical lineage in favor of Dionysian egotism (snobbish reference to the classics? Double points!) The culminative (making up words is perfectly fine) theory is this; the real designer ignores complexity (for which science is particularly suited to untangling) at his ??? and more importantly ??? his user???s, own peril. So embrace the sinistral (look it up) hemisphere of your grey matter and embrace science as the rational yang to your artistic yin.
Best Bit: ???This is a distorted artistic heritage of design, not at all about understanding systems and their emergent properties, which has come to a frontal collision with its scientific heritage.???